So instead of using [AD_PRICE] or [AD_SALEPRICE], the user could use [AD_MYPRICE] and wpCJ will return the result of the basic algorithm that the user specified in the 2 templates mentioned above.

I don’t like the N/A approach because you don’t see anything like that in serious sites. They show the sale price, or the sale price plus the reduced price… but never a Not/Assigned price.

What do you think about it?

Why not, if price=$0 then N/A.

The 2 template approach could work for a single product but not for multiple products unless you mean 2 templates within the main template?

Mansolo

Price and SalePrice short codes have been two fields in which we have been working on.

The problem is that many of the products promoted by CJ.com do not have any SalePrice at all… So if we add a SalePrice short code (which we had done in the past and then derogated) you won’t have a reliable way to use it in your templates because you may be showing your visitors something like “Sale Price: $0 – Our Price: $9.99″.

The best approach we have found is to create a general template to handle prices so the user can include some sort of intelligence into the process. Something like: If the product has SalePrice, use Price Template A. Otherwise, use Price Template B.

Any suggestion on this regard?